International Tax Policy And Double Tax Treaties Pdf
File Name: international tax policy and double tax treaties .zip
- On the relevance of double tax treaties
- Double taxation
- Review of Tax Treaty Practices and Policy Framework in Africa
On the relevance of double tax treaties
Double taxation is the levying of tax by two or more jurisdictions on the same income in the case of income taxes , asset in the case of capital taxes , or financial transaction in the case of sales taxes. Jurisdictions may enter into tax treaties with other countries, which set out rules to avoid double taxation. The term "double taxation" can also refer to the taxation of some income or activity twice.
For example, corporate profits may be taxed first when earned by the corporation corporation tax and again when the profits are distributed to shareholders as a dividend or other distribution dividend tax. There are two types of double taxation: jurisdictional double taxation, and economic double taxation. In the first one, when source rule overlaps, tax is imposed by two or more countries as per their domestic laws in respect of the same transaction, income arises or deemed to arise in their respective jurisdictions.
In the latter one, when same transaction, item of income or capital is taxed in two or more states but in hands of different person, double taxation arises. It is not unusual for a business or individual who is resident in one country to make a taxable gain earnings, profits in another country.
It could happen that a person will need to pay tax on that income locally and also in the country in which it was made. The stated goals for entering into a treaty often include reduction of double taxation, eliminating tax evasion, and encouraging cross-border trade efficiency. A DTA double tax agreement may require tax to be levied by the country of residence, and be exempt in the country in which it arises.
In other cases, the resident may pay a withholding tax to the country where the income arose, and the taxpayer receives a compensating foreign tax credit in the country of residence to reflect the fact that tax has already been paid.
In the former case, the taxpayer would declare himself in the foreign country a non-resident. In either case, the DTA may provide that the two taxation authorities exchange information about such declarations. Because of this communication between the countries, they also have a better view on individuals and companies who are trying to avoid or evade tax. Individuals "natural persons" can only be resident for tax purposes in one country at a time.
Corporate persons, owning foreign subsidiaries, can be based in one country and simultaneously based in another country: a subsidiary may make substantial income in one country but remit that income as license fees, for example to a holding company in another country that has a lower rate of corporation tax.
Because of this, the control of unreasonable tax avoidance of corporations becomes more difficult and it requires more investigation when goods, rights and services are transferred. Countries may reduce or avoid double taxation either by providing an exemption from taxation EM of foreign-source income or providing a foreign tax credit FTC for tax paid on foreign-source income.
The EM method requires the home country to collect the tax on income from foreign sources and remit it to the country where it arose. When countries rely on territorial principle as described above, [ where? But the EM method is only common for certain income classes or sources, such as international shipping income for example. The FTC method is used by countries that tax individual or corporate residents on income, irrespective of where it arises.
The FTC method requires the home country to allow credit against domestic tax liability where the person or company pay foreign income tax.
Another solution used is 'relief provision'. In the European Union , member states have concluded a multilateral agreement on information exchange. These people should have declared that foreign income in their own country of residence, so any difference suggests tax evasion.
For a transition period, some states have a separate arrangement. A study by Business Europe says that double taxation remains a problem for European MNEs and an obstacle for cross border trade and investments. Germany and Italy have been identified as the Member States in which most double taxation cases have occurred. Cyprus has entered into over 45 double taxation treaties and is negotiating with many other countries. Under these agreements, a credit is usually allowed against the tax levied by the country in which the taxpayer resides for taxes levied in the other treaty country, resulting in the taxpayer paying no more than the higher of the two rates.
Some treaties provide for an additional tax credit for tax which would have been otherwise payable had it not been for incentive measures in the other country which result in exemption or reduction of tax. In this case, a Korean resident person or company that receives dividends from a Czech company needs to balance the Czech dividend withholding tax but also the Czech tax on profits, profits of the company that pays the dividends. The treaty covers taxation of dividends and interest.
Copyrights to literature, works of art etc. If a foreign citizen is in Germany for less than a relevant day period approximately six months and is tax resident i. The relevant day period is either days in a calendar year or in any period of 12 months, depending upon the particular treaty involved.
So, for example, the Double Tax Treaty with the UK looks at a period of days in the German tax year which is the same as the calendar year ; thus, a citizen of the UK could work in Germany from 1 September through the following 31 May 9 months and then claim to be exempt from German tax. As the double taxation avoidance agreements will give the protection of income from some countries,. Different factors such as political and social stability, an educated population, a sophisticated public health and legal system, but most of all the corporate taxation makes the Netherlands a very attractive country of doing business in.
The Netherlands levies corporate income tax at a 25 per cent rate. Residents taxpayers are taxed on their worldwide income. Non-residents taxpayers are taxed on their income derived from Dutch sources.
There are two sorts of double taxation relief in The Netherlands. Economic double taxation relief is available with regard to proceeds from substantial equity investments under the participation.
Juridical double taxation relief is available for resident taxpayers having foreign source income items. In both situations there is a combined system in place which makes difference in active and passive income. While double taxation agreements do provide for relief from double taxation, Hungary only has some 73 of them in place.
This means that Hungarian citizens receiving income from the odd countries and territories that Hungary has no treaty with will be taxed by Hungary, regardless of any tax already paid elsewhere.
India has comprehensive double taxation avoidance agreement with 88 countries, out of which 85 have entered into force. Under the Income Tax Act of India , there are two provisions, Section 90 and Section 91, which provide specific relief to taxpayers to save them from double taxation. Section 90 bilateral relief is for taxpayers who have paid the tax to a country with which India has signed double taxation avoidance agreements, while Section 91 unilateral relief provides benefit to tax payers who have paid tax to a country with which India has not signed an agreement.
Thus, India gives relief to both kinds of taxpayers. The rates differ from country to country. Example of double taxation avoidance agreement benefit: Suppose interest on NRI [ clarification needed ] bank deposits attracts 30 per cent tax deduction at source in India. In case of any conflict between the provisions of the Income Tax Act or double taxation avoidance agreement, the provisions of the latter prevail.
A large number of foreign institutional investors who trade on the Indian stock markets operate from Singapore and the second being Mauritius. According to the tax treaty between India and Mauritius, capital gains arising from the sale of shares are taxable in the country of residence of the shareholder and not in the country of residence of the company whose shares have been sold. Therefore, a company resident in Mauritius selling shares of an Indian company will not pay tax in India.
Since there is no capital gains tax in Mauritius, the gain will escape tax altogether. The Protocol for amendment of the India-Mauritius Convention signed on 10 May , provides for source-based taxation of capital gains arising from alienation of shares acquired from 1 April in a company resident in India.
Simultaneously, investments made before 1 April have been grandfathered and will not be subject to capital gains taxation in India. Taxation in India at full domestic tax rate will take place from financial year onwards. The revised double taxation avoidance agreement between India and Cyprus signed on 18 November , provides for source based taxation of capital gains arising from alienation of shares, instead of residence based taxation provided under the double taxation avoidance agreement signed in However, a grandfathering clause has been provided for investments made prior to 1 April , in respect of which capital gains would continue to be taxed in the country of which taxpayer is a resident.
It also provides for assistance between the two countries for collection of taxes and updates the provisions related to Exchange of Information to accepted international standards. The India-Singapore double taxation avoidance agreement at present provides for residence based taxation of capital gains of shares in a company. The Third Protocol amends the agreement with effect from 1 April to provide for source based taxation of capital gains arising on transfer of shares in a company.
This will curb revenue loss, prevent double non-taxation and streamline the flow of investments. In order to provide certainty to investors, investments in shares made before 1 April have been grandfathered subject to fulfillment of conditions in Limitation of Benefits clause as per Protocol. Further, a two-year transition period from 1 April to 31 March has been provided during which capital gains on shares will be taxed in source country at half of normal tax rate, subject to fulfillment of conditions in Limitation of Benefits clause.
The Third Protocol also inserts provisions to facilitate relieving of economic double taxation in transfer pricing cases. The Third Protocol also enables application of domestic law and measures concerning prevention of tax avoidance or tax evasion. In principle, an Australian resident is taxed on their worldwide income, while a non-resident is taxed only on Australian-sourced income.
Both legs of the principle may give raise to taxation in more than one jurisdiction. To avoid double taxation of income by different jurisdictions, Australia has entered into double taxation avoidance agreements DTAs with a number of other countries, under which both countries agree on which taxes will be paid to which country.
In principle, United States citizens are liable to tax on their worldwide earnings, wherever they reside. However, some measures mitigate the resulting double tax liability. First, an individual who is a bona fide resident of a foreign country or is physically outside the United States for an extended time is entitled to an exclusion exemption of part or all of their earned income that is, personal service income, as distinguished from income from capital or investments.
Second, the United States allows a foreign tax credit by which income tax paid to foreign countries can be offset against U. The foreign tax credit is not allowed for tax paid on earned income that is excluded under the rules described in the preceding paragraph i.
Double taxation can also happen within a single country. This typically happens when sub-national jurisdictions have taxation powers, and jurisdictions have competing claims. In the United States a person may legally have only a single domicile. However, when a person dies different states may each claim that the person was domiciled in that state. Intangible personal property may then be taxed by each state making a claim.
Also, since each state makes its own rules on who is a resident for tax purposes, someone may be subject to the claims by two states on his or her income. College or university students may also be subject to claims of more than one state, generally if they leave their original state to attend school, and the second state considers students to be residents for tax purposes.
In some cases one state will give a credit for taxes paid to another state, but not always. In the US, the term "double taxation" is sometimes used to refer to dividend taxation. This situation arises when corporate profits are considered to have been taxed twice: first when earned by the corporation corporation tax and again when the profits are distributed to shareholders or stockholders as a dividend or other distribution dividend tax.
In recent years, [ when? Thus, dealing with cross-border taxation matters turns into one of the significant financial and trade projects of China, and the problems of cross-border taxation is still increasing. In order to solve the problems, the multilateral tax treaties between countries, which can provide legal support to help enterprises from both sides with double taxation avoidance and tax issues solutions, are established.
To fulfill the "going global" strategy of China and support the domestic enterprises to adapt to the globalization situation, China has been making efforts on promoting and signing multilateral tax treaties with other countries to achieve mutual interests.
By the end of November , China has officially signed double taxation avoidance agreements. Out of which 98 agreements have already entered into force. China also signed double taxation avoidance agreement with Taiwan in August , which has not entered into force yet.
Where information is available electronically hyperlinks have been inserted to applicable sources. To access the applicable official English language texts, once in the information page on the Australian Treaties Database click on the hyperlinked treaty official title. Its entry into force was notified under section 4A on 10 January Following entry into force, the Multilateral Instrument will generally take effect for each treaty partner as follows:. For further information on these dates, please refer to the synthesised texts that have been prepared in respect of individual treaties where available.
Back in I was in touch with Nairobi-based Tax Justice Network Africa, as they prepared to take the Kenyan government to court over its tax treaty with Mauritius, signed in The treaty seemed a pretty poor deal for Kenya, lacking adequate anti-abuse protection, preventing Kenya from imposing withholding tax on technical fees, and restricting its ability to impose capital gains tax, which it was in the process of introducing. It has taken more than four years, but on Friday the High Court ruled, and it has declared the ratification of the treaty in Kenya to be invalid. This is a landmark case, because tax treaties are usually technical instruments that undergo only cursory parliamentary scrutiny, if any at all. For a civil society organisation to challenge one in court, let alone win, is quite astonishing. TJN-A argued that the treaty was unconstitutional for two reasons: in content terms, the treaty would lead to an unacceptable loss of revenue; in process terms, it should have been subject to public consultation and approval by parliament. The court actually sided against TJN-A on both counts, stating among other things that it should have provided figures for the revenue lost which should make it untenable for governments to refuse to do the same and that consultation with Kenya Revenue Authority constituted adequate public participation.
Review of Tax Treaty Practices and Policy Framework in Africa
Tax treaties are agreements through which two countries agree to assign and restrict taxing rights on economic activities that span both countries. They were traditionally concluded mainly to avoid double taxation and create a favourable investment climate. However, in recent years, tax treaties concluded by sub-Saharan African countries — with OECD countries in particular — have often resulted in them slowly ceding their taxing rights over income earned within their jurisdiction. This revenue loss is not comparable to the expected benefits from foreign investment. Increased awareness of the impact of unfavourable tax treaties on state revenue has seen some sub-Saharan African countries cancel, suspend and or renegotiate some treaties.
Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. Holmes Published Economics.
Double taxation is the levying of tax by two or more jurisdictions on the same income in the case of income taxes , asset in the case of capital taxes , or financial transaction in the case of sales taxes. Jurisdictions may enter into tax treaties with other countries, which set out rules to avoid double taxation. The term "double taxation" can also refer to the taxation of some income or activity twice. For example, corporate profits may be taxed first when earned by the corporation corporation tax and again when the profits are distributed to shareholders as a dividend or other distribution dividend tax.
После того как я вскрыл алгоритм Попрыгунчика, он написал мне, что мы с ним братья по борьбе за неприкосновенность частной переписки. Сьюзан не могла поверить своим ушам. Хейл лично знаком с Танкадо.
В воздухе пахло жженой пластмассой. Вообще говоря, это была не комната, а рушащееся убежище: шторы горели, плексигласовые стены плавились. И тогда она вспомнила. Дэвид. Паника заставила Сьюзан действовать.
Да мы уже пробовали, - задыхаясь, сказала Сьюзан, пытаясь хоть чем-то помочь шефу.